By Mason Turner
Movement Fly 92
Overview
The Fly 92 (2026) is a playful twin‑tip ski aimed at freeskiers who spend time in the park and on urban features but still want the option to explore sidecountry. Its profile pairs traditional camber underfoot with rocker in the tip and tail, delivering lively pop and stable landings while remaining forgiving for switch tricks. The 92 mm waist is a sweet spot: narrow enough for precise rail work, yet wide enough to handle variable snow off piste when you want to step out of the park.
Construction and specifications
Construction uses a poplar wood core with triaxial fiberglass reinforcement and a double‑plate (fiber + titanal) under the binding for stronger mounting and better power transmission. A sintered P‑tex base increases durability and wax retention; full‑length alpine edges provide solid grip. Sidecut dimensions (e.g. 124‑92‑119 mm in 176 cm) dictate turn initiation and edge contact, while turn radius (14.5 m in 176 cm) indicates the ski's natural turn size.
On‑snow performance
On snow the Fly 92 feels lively and playful — camber gives snap and rebound for presses and ollies, while the tip/tail rocker smooths landings and makes the ski forgiving on sloppy features. In the park it excels at switch skiing, butters and presses thanks to its twin‑tip shape and poplar core. It also surprises off piste with usable float and decent edge hold, though at very high speeds and hard carving you'll notice limits compared with heavier freeride‑oriented skis.
Who it’s for & comparisons
This ski suits intermediate to advanced freestylers who prioritise park and urban performance but want a do‑it‑all tool for occasional sidecountry laps. Compared to other 92–95 mm twin tips, the Fly 92 stands out for its double‑plate reinforcement and cork‑tip damping which reduce chatter. Riders who spend most of their time in steep, high‑speed carving or deep snow may prefer a stiffer, heavier dedicated freeride ski.
Summary & next steps
In short, the Fly 92 is a confident park‑first ski that doubles as a capable sidecountry companion. Downsides are the lack of published weight figures and somewhat reduced high‑speed stability compared with heavier designs. Would you like me to (a) request exact weights from a retailer or manufacturer support, or (b) format the sidecut and radius data into a CSV for side‑by‑side comparison?
Loading images...
Community Opinions
Missing a hand while carrying ski gear?
A friend of mine created Clipstic, the easy way to attach your poles to your skis! Using this link you get 10% off as well as support for Pick-a-ski!
Check it out!